Since the bank is no more required, we must check on processing that bank is filled for accounts used. issue11198 review393581002
32 lines
1.8 KiB
XML
32 lines
1.8 KiB
XML
<?xml version="1.0"?>
|
|
<!-- This file is part of Tryton. The COPYRIGHT file at the top level of
|
|
this repository contains the full copyright notices and license terms. -->
|
|
<tryton>
|
|
<data grouped="1">
|
|
<record model="ir.message" id="msg_payment_process_no_mandate">
|
|
<field name="text">To process payment "%(payment)s" you must define a SEPA mandate for it.</field>
|
|
</record>
|
|
<record model="ir.message" id="msg_payment_process_no_iban">
|
|
<field name="text">To process payment "%(payment)s" you must define IBAN for it.</field>
|
|
</record>
|
|
<record model="ir.message" id="msg_payment_process_no_bank">
|
|
<field name="text">To process payment "%(payment)s" you must define a bank for the account "%(bank_account)s".</field>
|
|
</record>
|
|
<record model="ir.message" id="msg_mandate_unique_id">
|
|
<field name="text">SEPA mandate identification must be unique by company.</field>
|
|
</record>
|
|
<record model="ir.message" id="msg_mandate_delete_draft_cancelled">
|
|
<field name="text">To delete mandate "%(mandate)s" you must cancel it or reset its state to draft.</field>
|
|
</record>
|
|
<record model="ir.message" id="msg_party_no_id">
|
|
<field name="text">The party "%(party)s" is missing a "%(type)s" identifier.</field>
|
|
</record>
|
|
<record model="ir.message" id="msg_mandate_title">
|
|
<field name="text">SEPA %(scheme)s Direct Debit MANDATE</field>
|
|
</record>
|
|
<record model="ir.message" id="msg_mandate_authorisation_statement">
|
|
<field name="text">By signing this mandate form, you authorise (A) %(creditor)s to send instructions to your bank to debit your account and (B) your bank to debit your account in accordance with the instructions from %(creditor)s.</field>
|
|
</record>
|
|
</data>
|
|
</tryton>
|